Child Molestation, possession of child pornography, unlawful contact with a minor Cases
and child trafficking cases
Christine Voss and Addison Steele have:
handled these types of cases numerous times. Other than capital murder cases, these are the most challenging to defend. Often the consequences are extreme. The allegations do not have to be particularly egregious to result in a life in prison sentence. All cases of this nature can result in having to register as a sex offender. These cases are difficult to negotiate and challenging to present to a jury when a resolution cannot be negotiated. District Attorney offices tend to assign their most talented trial attorneys to these case, which makes it even more critical to have an attorney defending the case that is skilled in fighting this type of case.
The consequences from this type of case are so extreme that a person that has been accused really needs an attorney that is experienced in handling this type of case and has had success defending these cases, including having success fighting these cases in a jury trial.
Christine and Addison have negotiated these cases saving clients from life in prison sentences. They have saved clients from prison terms and they have saved clients from having to register as a sex offender.
However, when cases cannot be resolved the only alternative is to fight the case with a jury trial. If that's the case, a lawyer such as Christine or Addison who has won these kinds of cases is crucial to have. Another consideration is that a record of trial success in these kinds of cases is an essential aspect of negotiating a resolution because the specter of a jury trial is the strongest negotiating tool for the client.
Addison has done nine child molestation trials. That may not sound like a lot of trials, however there are few defense attorneys that have done even one trial of this type. It is extremely rare to find an attorney that has done a half dozen of these trials, much less an attorney like Addison that has done more than a half dozen.
Christine has done a child trafficking trial (the first in Santa Barbara County) and a child molestation trial that resulted in a settlement mid-trial for probation and registration only for the probation period.
ALL of the clients below the did not have press coverage not only gave permission to tell their stories on this webpage, but specifically asked that full light be brought to the outcome of their cases. Making an allegation of child molestation takes no more than a report to the police. That in turn leads to an arrest, and often press coverage. A person accused of child molestation, even if acquitted, is forever tainted. That's why those who have been acquitted want that acquittal to be known. Jury trials are public events, however acquittals never seem to get the same the same attention as accusations. Despite these all being public trials and the client's wanting their stories shared with the world, first names, a last initial and a case number are used.
Addison has done a trial where the client was acquitted of all charges (Felipe P., RIF108057) when he was facing 20 years in prison, another where the client was facing 45 years to life in prison acquitted of all felony charges and all the child molestation charges (Jorge D.C., 1411049), a trial where the client was facing 48 years eight months in prison and was acquitted of all felonies and all child molestation charges (Antolin I.H., 1461668), a trial where client facing 40 years eight months in prison and resulted in a hung jury on all counts (Lee M., RIF123536), and a trial where the client was facing four in prison and the district attorney dismissed the child molestation during trial (Josef J., RIF131284).
Christine did a trial where the client was facing 16 years in prison and the case settled during the trial after 12 court days of jury trial, for probation and only registration while on probation (Codey S., 1477699).
Total child molestation acquitted counts are 38 and total child molestation counts with a hung jury are four.
(Jorge D.C., 1411049)
Three acquittals for allegations of attempted sexual acts with a child ten years old or younger
(Penal Code § 664/288.7(a))
(Jorge D.C., 1411049)
Three acquittals for allegations of sexual penetration of a person under fourteen
(Penal Code § 289(j))
(Jorge D.C., 1411049)
Three acquittals for allegations of attempted sexual penetration of a person under fourteen
(Penal Code § 664/289(j))
(Jorge D.C., 1411049)
An acquittal on four counts for allegations of child molestation by means of force or fear
(Penal Code § 288(b)(1))
(Antolin I., 1461668)
An acquittal for an allegation of attempted rape
(Penal Code § 664/261(a)(2)
(Antolin I., 1461668)
An acquittal for an allegation of molestation of a fourteen or fifteen year-old (Penal Code § 288(c)(1))
(Antolin I., 1461668)
An acquittal on four counts for allegations of attempted child molestation by means of force or fear
(Penal Code § 664/288(b)(1))
An acquittal for an allegation of attempted molestation of a fourteen or fifteen year-old
(Penal Code § 664/288(c)(1))
(Felipe P., RIF108057).
Ten acquitted child molest counts
(Penal Code § 288(a))
(Felipe P., RIF108057).
A hung jury on two counts of continuous child molestation (Penal Code § 288.5)
(Lee M., RIF123536).
A hung jury on two counts of child molestation (Penal Code § 288(a))
(Lee M., RIF123536).
A hung jury on two counts of molestation of a fourteen or fifteen year-old (Penal Code § 288(c)(1))
(Lee M., RIF123536)
Child molestation cases are likely the most difficult to defend in front of a jury and they are among the most difficult to reach a reasonable settlement. If that weren't enough, the consequences of losing a child molest trial are extremely onerous, a loss can very well result in a life sentence in prison, or a life sentence of a combination of prison and forced incarceration in a mental institution, not to mention lifetime registration as a sex offender if the client should ever be released from custody, which in turn restricts where a person can live and what that person can do for the rest of his or her life. In a child molest trial constitutional rights are essentially thrown out the window because both the statutory law and case law are so focused on making it easy for the district attorney to win these kinds of cases. An example is that any prior child molest allegation or accusation of sexual misconduct will very likely come into evidence even if the client does not testify.
If you need to hire a lawyer for a child molestation case, you need a lawyer that has experience with child molestation cases and that has won child molestation cases before a jury. Christine and Addison have not only done several child molestation trials, they have had a full acquittal in a child molest trial and acquittals on all child molestation charges and very favorable settlements in jury trials. Trial success in these cases is important because only trial success is effective when negotiating a resolution of these cases with the district attorney. Very few attorneys have ever even conducted a trial in this type case, so there's no reason for a district attorney to take an attorney seriously that says they're prepared to go to trial when the district attorney knows that the attorney doesn't have experience conducting a jury trial in this type of case. So trial success is not just important if the case is eventually in front of jury, it's also important to be able to negotiate the case so it doesn't have to go in front of jury.
Christine and Addison's child molestation trial successes and experience:
Child Molested Cases


Molestation and related cases with extremely favorable outcomes
without a trial
These cases have VERY extreme consequences. The exposure is often a life in prison sentence and can be hundreds of years to life in prison. The myth that these kinds of cases are not aggressively prosecuted or that the consequences are light, is just that, a myth. Christine and Addison have had very positive outcomes in cases without having to take the case to trial.
Gerald G., 1502241, on April 5, 2017 Settled his life sentence exposure case for probation.
Most people are familiar with the landmark United States Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainright (1963) 372 U.S. 335. Gideon established that the right to an attorney meant a right to an appointed attorney if the person cannot afford to hire an attorney. There is a juvenile equivalent of Gideon with which all practitioners of juvenile defense are familiar. That landmark United States Supreme Court case is In re Gault (1967) 387 U.S. 1. That child that was the subject of Gault, was as an old man accused of child molestation. Addison was his lawyer. He was facing spending the rest of his life in prison, more precisely 52 years to life in prison. Gerry maintained his innocence and wanted nothing more than to fight the case with a jury trial. Shortly before the trial was to begin he was offered probation and credit for time served (get out of jail). He was facing 52 years to life in prison if he lost at trial, and at his age even if he won all but one or two counts and were to receive a much shorter prison sentence, it would still be a life sentence. Addison's work on the case got him released from jail with probation. Probation on any child molestation case is a huge victory, but it is even more so when the client is faced with life in prison as Gerry was.
This is Gerry and Addison after Addison saved him from a life in prison sentence and got him out of jail

This is Gerry with all the Addison and all the attorneys from the public defender's office

You can follow the press for Gerald from beginning to end here































































































































Ramoan B., 1504038, On February 6, 2017 resolved his case probation with credit for time served, he was
facing twelve years prison
Daniel M., 1500744, On June 13, 2016 Saved from a life in prison sentence, resolved his case for eight years
Prison
Questions you should ask an attorney that you are considering hiring for a child molestation case:
- Have you done a child molest trial before?
- This question is important because a child molest trial involves complex legal issues and they are inevitably extremely emotional. Somewhat like a murder trial, it requires specialized knowledge and experience.
- Addison has done nine child molestation trials, that may not sound like a lot, but there are very few defense attorneys that have done even one trial like this. Christine has done a child molestation trial and a child trafficking trial. Addison has also spend 102 court days in child molestation trials, if the average trial is five days that's the equivalent of 10 trials. Christine has not only done a child molest trial, she did the first child trafficking case trial in Santa Barbara County.
- What were the results of your child molestation trials?
- This question is important because in a child molestation trial the defense has to be relentless and the attorney has to have the skills and experience to overcome the prejudices the jurors have after just having heard the charges. If an attorney has won several child molestation trials, that attorney has the experience and skills to handle the level of complexity involved in a child molestation trial.
- Addison has had a full acquittal in a child molestation case where the client confessed on videotape and the child came into court and testified that she was molested. He had an acquittal on all child molest-related charges, losing only two counts of misdemeanor simple battery, in a child molestation case where the client confessed on videotape and the child came into court and testified that she was molested. He had yet another acquittal where the client confessed on videotape, but in that case the child testified that an uncle had molested her (despite that the district attorney pressed on because he was convinced that the child's initial statement accusing the client was the true statement). In all criminal jury trials, the district attorney gets to file the charges and decide whether or not to have a trial. They only do that with cases they believe they can win. The result is that in most jurisdictions, the defense can expect to win no more than one in ten trials, and if that is the case, it may have a hung jury in one of twenty trials. Addison has had a full and complete victory in three out of the eight child molestation trials has done and had positive outcomes in six of the nine child molestation trials he has done, he has had 39 acquitted counts, and these trials are really the most difficult trials to win. If you find another attorney that has done the number of child molestation trials that Christine and Addison have done and that attorney has had more (verifiable) successful outcomes than Christine and Addison have had, and that attorney has had more clients go home free after a child molestation trial than Christine and Addison have had, hire that firm. If you want the best possible chance of not going to prison for a long sentence or even a life sentence and potentially going home, you should contact Christine or Addison.
- Do you train other lawyers in your techniques for winning child molest trials?
- This question is important because typically only the leading lawyers in a field are invited to conduct training for other lawyers.
- Addison was a speaker at the California Public Defenders Association (CPDA) homicide defense training in 2011 to train on his winning trials by humanizing the client method. He also has given that same training at the Riverside County Public Defenders Office, the Riverside County Barristers, the Santa Clara County Public Defenders Office, the Santa Barbara County Public Defenders Office, and the San Francisco County Public Defenders Office. He was a speaker at the CPDA homicide defense training in 2012 to train on utilizing a neuropsychologist in a homicide case. All these skills and techniques that he teaches are easily utilized in child molestation trials.
- How long were the child molestation trials you've done, and how many days of defense did you present?
- These questions are important because although some cases just call for a short trial, a short trial can also mean that the prosecution was not sufficiently challenged or that no defense was presented.
- A child molestation trial that lasts two, three or four court days is reason for concern because it's an indicator that the prosecution is not being thoroughly challenged and a complete defense is not being presented. Addison has spent 102 court days in child molestation trials and Christine has 42 court days in child molestation and child trafficking cases. They have a success rate in child molestation and related trials that is really unparalleled.